-
“Michael” Moonwalks to $97M Opening: A Record-Breaking Hit, But What Happens Next?
The King of Pop is back, and audiences showed up in full force.

Michael, the long-awaited Michael Jackson biopic, opened to a massive $97M domestic debut and $219M worldwide.
That’s not just an incredible opening, it’s a record setter:
It’s the biggest debut ever for a:
- Musical biopic (passing Straight Outta Compton, which opened to $60 million in 2015).
- Traditional biopic (passing American Sniper, which opened to $89 million in 2015)
- Post-COVID movie for the Lionsgate studio (passing John Wick Chapter 4, which opened to $73 million in 2023)


Overall, this is a fantastic start to the summer movie season, and it’s not just happening in a vacuum.
There’s multiple Hollywood films right on deck primed for success at the box office.
The Devil Wears Prada 2 is tracking for a $80-100 million opening next weekend on May 1.
Mortal Kombat 2 is targeting a $50 million debut the weekend after on May 8.
The Mandalorian And Grogu is eyeing a $100 million launch over the holiday weekend on May 22.
Summer 2026 is officially off to a hot start.


But the real questions I want to discuss are, what are the 3 lessons that Michael’s success proves, and can the film’s success somehow be replicated?
LESSON #1: MICHAEL JACKSON IS A MOVIE STAR, AND THE CASTING ADDED VALUE
While this debut for Michael is a spectacular result, it shouldn’t be a surprise.
Michael Jackson was, at his peak, perhaps the most famous artist on the planet.
He was a child prodigy, a cultural icon, a controversial figure, and he left a mythical legacy after his death.
A biopic about his life was inevitable.


Plus, casting Jaafar Jackson (Michael’s real-life nephew) was a smart commercial move.
While Jafaar Jackson is not exactly a star, having the late singer played by his own nephew to pantomime perfection (not a criticism, that’s the assignment) provided authenticity and curiosity to his performance.
It’s almost as if you were actually watching Michael himself perform on stage.

LESSON #2: MAKE A FILM THAT’S FUN FOR GENERAL AUDIENCES AND FANS

Director Antoine Fuqua (as well as producer Graham King & screenwriter John Logan) did the job in making a “fun for audiences and fans” biopic of Michael Jackson.
I saw the film myself last week, and while the musical numbers are really special to watch, it’s not really trying to dissect Michael as a person.


The story lacks depth and characterization, as Michael himself feels like a Saint with almost no character flaws.
Most of the film’s conflict centers around Michael’s relationship with his abusive father and manager, Joe Jackson.


All the other supporting characters, such as Michael’s siblings, don’t have any defining personalities.
The end result is a shallow film, but entertaining celebration of Michael Jackson’s initial (1966-1988) musical hits, with none of the controversial elements that followed.
That last part is important…

LESSON #3: AUDIENCES DON’T WANT TO SEE THE DARKER ELEMENTS OF MICHAEL JACKSON’S LIFE

Interesting fact, the producers filmed an entire 3rd act finale which followed the controversies and allegations with Michael in the 1990s, before the Jackson family lawyers informed the filmmakers they’d broken their nondisclosure agreement!
So poof! 3rd act of the movie is out. Add a month of reshoots.
And now the movie simply ends with a title card, “Michael’s Journey Will Continue….”


Critics have overly disliked the film, giving Michael a 38% score on Rotten Tomatoes, saying that the film omits almost all of the darker elements of Michael’s life.
As a moviegoer do you want (A) a movie where you only experience the artists’ greatest hits, or (B) a movie where you get to understand the artist more as a person, flaws and all?
Since the film has a A- from CinemaScore and a 97% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes it seems clear moviegoers wanted option A: Michael’s greatest hits.


Even critics have also noted that, if you just want a safe, well-acted IMAX-worthy recreation of Michael’s musical concert performances, you’ll at least get that.
In the end, Michael Jackson is an artist where a majority of his fans just want to see a celebration of his greatest hits.

THE “MARIO EFFECT” — FOR MUSIC BIOPICS

In a weird way, Michael functions similarly to the most recent Mario Galaxy movie.
Their commercial success is less about creative storytelling, and more about delivering exactly what fans already love.
Both Michael and Mario are films primarily intended for the Leo DiCaprio pointing meme: designed mainly for fans to watch and point at their favorite things on screen.
For many fans, that feeling is enough.

NOW THE BIG QUESTION… LEGS! (NO PUN INTENDED)

Let’s start with comparing the film to a other pop-rock biopic Bohemian Rhapsody, also produced by Michael producer Graham King.
Bohemian Rhapsody ended in 2018 with $904 million worldwide, off a $122 million global debut.
With a $200 million budget (which was inflated due to the reshoots the film had to go through), Lionsgate has shared that Michael needs to earn $700 million worldwide to justify a sequel.


I’m expecting an ending-total near $750-900 million worldwide, depending on how front loaded it plays with other adult films this summer.
If it lands in that range, it’s a major win.
SO YES, A SEQUEL MAY BE JUSTIFIED, BUT SHOULD IT GET MADE?
This is where things get super tricky.
A Michael 2 would likely cover:
- The 1990s Neverland Ranch era
- The controversies
- The legal battles
And that’s… a very different movie.


Ignoring the questionable subject matter (who knows if audiences actually want to follow this up with a full legal drama, and sexual abuse allegations), what’s even left to show in terms of Michael’s music?
There’s Black Or White, Remember The Time, and HIStory, but these songs are not as musically interesting or as popular with fans.
If a sequel to Michael ever gets made, I expect a steep drop-off in interest and excitement among fans.

If Michael Part 1 is: “Come celebrate Michael Jackson”, then Part 2 becomes: “Now let’s see our hero get tarnished”
That’s a much tougher sell. It might be best just to call it a day, and stick to the one movie that makes us feel happy.
MUSICAL BIOPIC TAKEAWAY

While its sequel’s commercial prospects are questionable, Michael’s success proves something very clear:

If you have an adored musical artist, and youwant to make a hit-movie, it’s okay to focus on the performance and not go for complexity or nuance.
Audiences really want to see celebratory musical recreations, of their favorite performer at their peak.
And that’s it for the weekend box office. What films are you still interested in seeing or hearing about?
I’m looking forward to writing again in this column later as the summer movie season continues.
-
Bad Boys Ride or Die Blazes Past Expectations with $57 Million Opening Weekend, + Five reasons to be optimistic this summer
I was tempted to give this story the headline, “Will Smith Slaps The Box Office Into Overdrive”, but it seemed like such low-hanging fruit.

The last time I wrote in this blog it was last summer, as Barbenheimer was saving the summer box office, which brought the 2023 box office to unprecedented heights post-COVID.
Now in 2024, how are the summer movies shaping up? Well…..
If you believe industry pundits, then the box office and theatrical industry are DYING right now.But actually, the industry is in a much, much better state than you may think. Here are 5 reasons to have optimism.

REASON #1: NO, THE SKY IS NOT FALLING

Ever since The Fall Guy underperformed in early May, there has been a narrative out there that movie theaters and theatrical moviegoing are dying, which has been compounded by hundreds of pundits in the entertainment media and trades, who keep repeating the same mantra: because the big summer releases were flopping, “the sky is falling”.
COVID and streaming have unequivocally changed moviegoing habits, for sure.But last year’s strikes delayed movies that were expected to be “tentpole” events for summer 2024 (Mission: Impossible 8, Captain America: Brave New World, and ESPECIALLY Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse) into 2025. This has lead the industry to have higher expectations for the movies being released this summer.

The strikes also greatly increased the budget for many of these movies too, making it harder to earn a profit. See below for what I mean (items in red highlight my point).
Film Title Pre-Release Opening Weekend Expectations
ACTUAL Opening WeekendAverage Budget for Films in this genre or franchise
ACTUAL Film Budget
The Fall Guy
$35-40 million
$27 million$70-90 million
(original movie-star-driven action comedy)
$150 million
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
$50 million
$58 million$150-170 million
(Apes Franchise)
$165 million
If$40 million $33 million $60-80 million
(original family CGI/live-action hybrid)$110 million Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga $50 million $32 million $150 million
(Mad Max franchise)$168 million Garfield $30 million $31 million $60-100 million
(animated family film based on IP)$60 million Bad Boys Ride or Die $30 million $57 million $90-130 million
(Bad Boys franchise)$100 million BIG FILMS THAT OPENED SO FAR THIS SUMMER Looking at this table, 3 out of the 6 big films released this summer (The Fall Guy, If, Furiosa) have failed to meet their Pre-Release Expectations for Opening Weekend, and COST WAY TOO MUCH to possibly make a profit.
However, Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, Garfield, and now Bad Boys Ride or Die prove that there is still demand and life in these respective franchises, as long as they set their expectations and budget right.
REASON #2: MANAGE EXPECTATIONS AND BUDGET

The latest installment in the Bad Boys franchise Bad Boys Ride or Die has defied expectations, by opening with a whopping $57 million.
One smart thing Sony Pictures did was to set low expectations, only predicting a TINY $30 million opening. But then on opening day it earned a $22 million, Day 2 $20 million, and Day 3 $15 million.
Those same industry pundits who a few weeks ago were doom and gloom are now gushing – “surprise hit!!”, and “Never saw this coming”.

But if Sony had followed the expectations model of Furiosa and Planet of the Apes (both expected to open with $50 million), pundits might have just yawned. There’s nothing like beating a low target soundly to create a sense of success.
REASON #3: MARKET TO YOUR CORE AUDIENCE

While the last Bad Boys film’s audience was mostly evenly split racially (42% African American, 30% Caucasian, 18% Hispanic), this new film’s audience leaned MUCH more heavy towards people of color (44% African American, 26% Hispanic, and ONLY 18% Caucasian).
This makes sense, as Will Smith and Martin Lawrence prioritized a bigger share of the film’s marketing budget to BIPOC media outlets, than they did for any other other Bad Boys film. They knew that if they could get their BASE fanbase fired up, the rest would come along for the ride… and boom.
Sony’s decision to market the film as an event for core demographics absolutely payed off.

REASON #4: STAR POWER AND CHEMISTRY

Like the previous films, Will Smith and Martin Lawrence have delivered the same lively, energetic, and entertaining performances that fans have come to want and expect.
And the reaction to Bad Boys 4 has thus far been very positive.
It earned an A- CinemaScore grade from audiences (a bit lower than the previous 3 films’ A grades), so while it may arguably be the “worst” film in the series, this success proves that there is still life left in this franchise.


The success of this film also signifies a triumphant return for Will Smith, who has been absent from leading blockbuster roles for the past 5 years.
Now that he is officially “back”, it wouldn’t be surprising if a studio gives him a big blockbuster leading role again, like potentially I Am Legend 2 or Men In Black 4. He’s got the chops, he’s still beloved, and he can obviously still sell tickets.
This opening and reception sets the stage for Bad Boys 4 to end with 160M+ in the U.S. (bigger than the last Fast and Furious movie, and on par with the last Mission: Impossible, as far as long running action franchises go domestically).
Worldwide, it will likely end with $300 million+. On a $100 million budget, that’s a huge success.
Expect Bad Boys V: Five Times the Trouble in a few years.
REASON #5: CHEAP ANIMATED FAMILY MOVIES STILL DO WELL

Sony’s family-friendly Garfield reboot continues to perform steadily, earning $10.1 million in its third weekend (-29% from last weekend) for a total of $68.9 million in the U.S., and a likely final total of $230+ million worldwide.
While not a blowout hit, especially with Inside Out 2 coming out next weekend, the film has earned a respectable amount of money from families, given its expectations and low $60 million budget.
And because I feel like it, here’s an side on the other films:
Both If (-24% for a $93 million 24-day total) and The Fall Guy (-35% for a $85 million 38-day total) are holding nicely with solid drops due to great word of mouth.
Yet, due to underwhelming overall box office (If and The Fall Guy will likely end with only $220-240 million and $175-200 million worldwide respectively), and extremely high budgets as I mentioned earlier, neither of them will earn a profit theatrically. It’s tragic, but not surprising. Remember, keep your budgets in check!


20th Century Studios / Disney’s Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes remains the highest grossing movie of this summer, with a fifth weekend of $5.75 million (-36% from last weekend) and a domestic U.S. total of $151 million. The film has a $165 million budget, and will likely finish worldwide with around $375-$390 million, a modest success for a blockbuster nowadays.Ultimately, Kingdom feels like a movie that will do very well on streaming/VOD, and could be discovered by much more people after it’s theatrical run. I’d expect the next film – as long as it comes out within 2-4 years of this film – to have an increase in the box office.
I think for the next film, they should get a more recognizable actor/actress to play one of the main human characters. Kingdom has NO STARS in the film, which helped the budget, but likely also hurt it’s promotions/ marketing and general awareness.


Warner Brothers’ Furiosa continues to slide into a box office pit of despair, earning just $4.1 million in its 3rd weekend (-61% from last weekend) for a total of $58 million in the U.S. and $144 million worldwide. It has taken took 3 weeks for Furiosa to earn what Bad Boys will earn in 3 days. Yikes!
I’m expecting a $180-200 million worldwide finish, which on a $168 million budget, is a horrible flop. Too bad, BUT I LOVED IT ANYWAY!
I have 2 takeaways from Furiosa’s dreadful box office performance: #1 The lightning-in-a-bottle reception of Fury Road was NOT replicable without Tom Hardy or Charlize Theron.
#2: Telling the origin story of an iconic fan-favorite character (paired with a younger/less popular actor) is box office poison, no matter how good it ends up being (see also Solo: A Star Wars Story or Pixar’s Lightyear).


If Furiosa does end up being the last film in the Mad Max franchise, it would be tragic, but understandable.
At least director George Miller can stand tall (at the age of 80 !!) that he made this franchise the way he wanted, earning high praise from critics and audiences each time, even with low box office returns.
WHY NEXT WEEKEND WILL CONTINUE TO SHOW THAT THEATERS ARE ALIVE
Next weekend comes the release of the Inside Out 2, which will be a huge test on the viability of Pixar’s brand, over the past 4 years of their *arguably* best films (like Soul or Luca) getting dumped for free on Disney+.
The industry is expecting an $80-90 million opening weekend, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it potentially opens over $100+ million. Ticket pre-sales have been excellent so far, and 9 years ago the first Inside Out opened with $90 million. We’ll see!


Next weekend should also have a great drop for Bad Boys 4, with Fathers Day next Sunday. It’s crazy to think that a Bad Boys movie can now qualify as Dad-friendly-entertainment, but don’t be surprised: this is an action movie starring two men pushing 60.
And that’s it for the weekend box office. What films are you still interested in seeing or hearing about?
I’m looking forward to writing again in this column next weekend.
-
BOMBS AND DOLLS: What is getting Americans off their couches and into movie theaters for Barbenheimer?
The theater event being hailed as Barbenheimer is going to be analyzed for years. Savor and remember this moment.

What just started as a petty rivalry between two movies (in 2020 after Christopher Nolan quit Warner Brothers and moved to Universal, WB reacted by placing their film Barbie on the SAME date as Nolan’s next film Oppenheimer), has now become a mutually beneficial phenomenon.
Opening the weekend of July 21st, Barbie opened to $162 million and Oppenheimer opened to $82.4 million. There’s a movie for everybody with these two films.


Posttrak is reporting 68% of Barbie’s audience was female, while 65% of Oppenheimer’s audience was male. You can imagine a couple going to the theater, kissing each other goodbye, walking into different theaters, and both coming out with a smile.
Many theatergoers aren’t making a choice, they’re seeing both. When I and a friend saw both films last Friday, we were in a sea of others dressed their best, either in pink, suits, or science related outfits at the AMC.
It was like gathering to witness a rare cosmic event.


This is particularly hopeful, as it shows that even post COVID, there can be event movies that get everyone talking and excited enough to make the visit to the multiplex. The question is – why are they getting off their couches? I‘ve got 2 key thoughts:

1. Unique Subject Matter, with Clever Execution
The buzz around both movies shows audiences are hungry for new stories that aren’t just 5th or 7th entries in a franchise (looking at you, Indiana Jones, Mission Impossible, Transformers), or formulaic stories (e.g. every superhero story right now).
Sure Barbie is an existing IP, but unlike The Super Mario Bros Movie – which follows the plot of a beloved game – there’s a blank canvas for creating a story.
Interest ended up being so high for Barbie, that it beat The Super Mario Bros Movie for the BIGGEST opening weekend of the year, $162 million to $146 million respectfully.


Just like with The Lego Movie, many audience goers want to see Barbie out of both nostalgia and curiosity. The marketing reflected the playfulness, opening the film up as something both kids and adults could proudly enjoy.
With Barbie, women are showing up in droves, but (plot twist notwithstanding) it’s okay to be a guy in the audience, too.
The story is layered, both entertaining and satirical, poking fun at the Barbie mythos in subversive and clever ways that empower women and offer a nice viewpoint on modern day feminism.


Similarly, the story and subject matter are massive key selling points for Oppenheimer.
The interesting thing about Oppenheimer is that everyone knows how it ends (spoiler alert – we make an atomic bomb), but The Manhattan Project is one of those mysterious events that EVERYONE knows about superficially, but not the details.
Even at 3 hours and a dour tone, with mostly talking and little action, the storytelling is thrilling, riveting, and intense in a very non-History-Channel way.
By the end of the movie, the audience has a deeper appreciation not just for J. Robert Oppenheimer, but for all the people who came together to create this dreadful weapon.

Barbie takes a well known toy, and tells a smart engaging story that feels fresh. Oppenheimer takes a well known event, and gives you a peek behind the curtain of “the most important man who ever lived, who genuinely created the power to destroy the world”.
Both Barbie and Oppenheimer are stories that people don’t know and find intriguing – and somehow feel important enough to find out about ASAP.
2. Huge fanbase for the Director/Cast


Oppenheimer’s massive opening shows Director Christopher Nolan is still in his prime. He’s the modern equivalent of Spielberg and Scorsese, a director whose involvement on a project guarantees some semblance of quality and commercial success.
His last film Tenet managed to gross over $360m worldwide in 2020 during the peak of the pandemic, almost entirely off Nolan’s name alone.
And now with a remarkable $82.4 million debut, Oppenheimer is a career best for Nolan opening a non-Batman movie.


With Barbie, they casted the film perfectly. The likability of both Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling in the main roles is a big reason why the anticipation is so high.
Greta Gerwig is also likely a draw as writer/director of Barbie. For a significant portion of the audience, she is an “it” director after making both Lady Bird and Little Women, she’s a trusted voice in directing female-driven movies.


Both Barbie and Oppenheimer will likely have wonderful staying power for the rest of the summer. Both films are completely satisfying for audiences (“A” Cinemascores for both).
Yet each has fast paced stories, where a lot of details could be missed during the first watch, that I suspect repeat viewing for both will be big.


For Barbie, imagine $500 million just in the U.S. plus more than $1 billion worldwide. For Oppenheimer, imagine $700-$800 million worldwide, one of the biggest biopics ever made.
And with the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes going on, both Barbie and Oppenheimer may also be the last big budget hit films for the rest of the summer, if not the year.
I really hope the insane success of Oppenheimer thus far emboldens Paramount to go all out on pushing and marketing Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon this fall – another 3 hour epic, with major stars, a marquee director, but most of all an important subject matter.


My hope from the massive successes of Barbie and Oppenheimer is that conventional wisdom of what a blockbuster can also be is rethought. Maybe there is a way to re-engage that portion of the public who swore off theaters for the comfort of their couch.
Yes – core movie-going audiences will still see franchise and formulaic movies – but clever, thoughtful stories done well can be BIG blockbusters too, and can be worth taking a chance on.
-
Tom Cruise’s latest Mission Impossible opens to $79 million – but why didn’t it open bigger at the box office?
The last time I wrote in this blog, it was last year, as Top Gun Maverick was soaring past $700 million in the U.S. I asked the question then, “Can Tom Cruise be stopped?”, and, well, the answer to that question might exist sooner than I thought.

Tom Cruise’s latest Mission Impossible film opened with “just” $235 million worldwide, $78.49 million of which is coming from the U.S.
In hindsight, it was hyperbolic of me to expect this to open to $125 million and $300 million+ worldwide.
But everything was here for Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning Part 1 to open BIGGER. Amazing reviews, check! Amazing audience reactions, check! Franchise goodwill, check! Tom Cruise is also near a career-high right now.
I’m here to offer 3 reasons why Tom Cruise’s latest didn’t perform the best.

REASON #1 : LITTLE NEW TO OFFER, AS A TOM CRUISE FILM
It was unrealistic to expect this new Mission Impossible to receive a bump after Top Gun: Maverick last summer.
Unlike that sequel to a singular film from 1986, this is the 7th installment (!!) of a franchise which was already revived, and hit a critical/commercial peak already with the last film Mission Impossible: Fallout in 2018.
Now 7 movies in, we can count Tom Cruise has done over 12 Karate-chop running scenes, over 7 180-degree-turns with a motorcycle , and countless deadly stunts to show Tom Cruise and his constantly impressive “death wish”.

How many times has Ethan Hunt’s character been told the world will end if he doesn’t succeed? And that “nothing matters more than THIS mission”?
In short – despite how thrilling it still is – there’s nothing new, except even crazier stunts.


REASON #2: BUDGET IS WAY WAY TOO EXPENSIVE!
MI7 is falling victim to so many other blockbuster movies these days – they are way too expensive to justify the box office.
Yes – the box office for many movies these days looks high, but in order to break even, the expected box office should be at least 2.5x the budget. (this is based on marketing costs, and the fact that theaters take 1/2 the box office)
I call these 2023 films: “Disappointments in relation to costs”. See below for recent blockbusters, which all had astronomically high budgets due to COVID-related issues during filming.
These films all could have made money, if they had cost less.

MOVIE BUDGET ESTIMATED BREAK EVEN # (BASED ON 2.5x RULE) WORLDWIDE BOX OFFICE RESULT The Little Mermaid $250 million $625 million $575-600 million DISAPPOINTMENT ($25-50 million loss) Transformers: Rise Of The Beasts $200 million $500 million $450-475 million DISAPPOINTMENT ($25-50 million loss) Fast X $340 million $825 million $700-$725 million FLOP ($100-$125 million loss) The Flash $220 million $550 million $250 million FLOP ($200-300 million loss) Indiana Jones: Dial Of Destiny $300 million $750 million $450-500 million FLOP ($250-300 million loss) Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning $290 million $725 million ? ? So you might wonder: are studios just over estimating their box office? And could they get just as “good” a movie if they made something less expensive and more realistic?
In the end based on its opening, MI7 should end with around $700-750 million worldwide.
It will probably break even – but that’s not the way Tom Cruise is supposed to roll.


REASON #3: TOO MANY OTHER MOVIES / COMPETITION
Let’s address the Barbie-Oppenheimer elephant in the room. All the hype right now is around those two movies, and the industry is expecting a combined $200 million opening next weekend for the combined two films.
No matter how great Tom Cruise’s 7th film in this franchise is, both Barbie and Oppenheimer are so unique, different, and intriguing to adult audiences, that they’re sucking up all the air in the theater.
Coming out right after Indiana Jones 5 isn’t helping, as well as the new conservative anti-human-trafficking film Sound Of Freedom. Both of which will likely earn $150-$175 million each in the U.S.
Too many adult action thrillers playing in theaters right now.

Long story short, which ever Paramount Studios executive chose to place this Mission Impossible into this incredibly crowded release date really dropped the ball.

To end things on a positive note: because Dead Reckoning is a Part 1, the pieces are there for Part 2 to earn more!
These last two Mission Impossible movies were SO well loved (‘A’ grade audience scores for MI6 and MI7, both the highest in the series), that if MI8 opens with less competition, audiences will absolutely show up again.
Plus, maybe bring back Jeremy Renner, Michelle Monaghan, or flashbacks from Rebecca Ferguson, and everyone from the old movies to help Tom Cruise fight this final mission! There are ways Tom Cruise could still end this story strong.
As for next week, expect the biggest weekend at the movies all year!

Warner Brothers’ Barbie opens, as the default “event movie of the year” for women. And who can blame them?
The director (Greta Gerwig) and cast (Margot Robbie, Ryan Gosling) look like they’re having a ton of fun, and the marketing campaign surrounding them has been nothing short of extraordinary.

At first I thought it was crazy to expect an opening for Barbie over $100 million, but now after ticket sales have been so strong, a $150-$200 million debut would not surprise me!
There’s simply nothing else like this comedy in the marketplace.
Also coming out is tonally the exact OPPOSITE film from Barbie, Universal and Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer: an epic intense 3 hour WWII thriller, about the creation of the Atomic bomb.
The trailers have looked gorgeous yet horrifying, the cast is stacked (Cillian Murphy, Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, Florence Pugh, Robert Downey Jr.), the director Chris Nolan has a passionate fanbase, and the buzz is the film itself is an amazing achievement.
Expect a $50-70 million debut.

The fear though is that both Barbie and Oppenheimer will be such big hits, both so appealing to adults and moviegoers, that Mission Impossible may be left in the dust and drop 60%+ next weekend. We’ll see!

And that’s it for the weekend box office. What films are you still interested in seeing or hearing about?
I’m looking forward to writing again in this column next weekend.
-
DC Films Leadership – James Gunn and Peter Safran now CEOS – how did this happen, and what could this mean?

James Gunn is having a very great week this week (this news dropped as the trailer for his new Guardians of the Galaxy Disney+ special), which shows that perhaps getting FIRED from Disney 4 years ago, ironically, led to the best possible career jump Gunn could have ever had.
THE HOW:
You may already recall in July 2018, when the Guardians of the Galaxy filmmaker James Gunn was fired from Disney and Marvel, due to Tweets written by Gunn from years past which were seen as “too vulgar” and “immature” for Disney’s brand.


Many fans and cast members begged Disney to reconsider, resulting in the studio and its execs eventually agreeing to hire James Gunn back after a month.
But during that month of absence, the filmmaker allegedly became disinterested in Marvel, only promising to finish the Guardians of the Galaxy’s storyline, and nothing more. Can you blame him?
After James Gunn was fired, he was very quickly picked up by Warner Bros. who immediately signed him on to direct DC’s The Suicide Squad. While the film bombed, it opened to critical acclaim (90% Rotten Tomatoes), and was the best reviewed DC project in years.


Now jump to today, and James Gunn has produced a few successful DC shows (Peacemaker + Harley Quinn The Animated Series), along with his life-long producing partner Peter Safran, seen on the bottom photo on the right. Both Gunn and Safran have earned so much goodwill from Warner Bros. that their CEO David Zazlav, seen in the top image, has just signed them on for a 4 year contract, as co-CEO and Co-chairmen over DC Studios.
This is a massive deal for the studio, even if the core talent essentially remains the same.
Warner Brothers’ CEO David Zazlav has made no secret that he’s desperately been looking for showrunners to produce the next 10 years of DC storylines and films, as Kevin Feige has done so successfully with Marvel.


Personally, I don’t think James Gunn will be as successful as Kevin Feige, as there’s still too much baggage around DC, compared to Marvel. But James Gunn will soon have Kevin Feige’s level of exposure.
James Gunn will be there to appear at every Comic Con presentation, every premiere red carpet, and every press junket for every DC project going forward.
Let’s just hope James Gunn hires a very good publicist to watch what he says. Because as we’ve seen from his previous tweets, Gunn can be pretty vulgar and crude sometimes when saying things off the cuff.


I’m also hoping future James Gunn / Peter Safran projects are capped at $100 million, as every artist had their creative limit.
Just look at James Gunn’s own The Suicide Squad, which while well-received well by critics, the film was too expensive ($185 million budget) and earned practically no money ($168 million worldwide + HBOMax) to earn any profit.
General Audiences who saw the film gave it a “B+” Cinemascore, indicating a mixed but positive reaction. The TV shows which he later produced (Peacemaker and Harley Quinn) similarly received great reviews but only “so-so” streaming numbers.
Perhaps Gunn’s brand, and R-rated style and vision, might not be appealing for everyone or all DC fans. He has a a fun creative direction, and he clearly knows what characters he’s better at adapting (he himself admitted he couldn’t write many of DC’s female characters).
This just means we’re going to get more films like The Suicide Squad or Peacemaker, less like Wonder Woman or Batgirl. Whether this new focus translates to an expanding DC fan base remains to be seen.


I think a very valid concern is Warner Bros. CEO David Zazlav: he has been selling off franchises and IP’s left and right, firing staffers, laying off the animation division, and restructuring up to $4 BILLION in content write-offs.
He is trying to make Warner Brothers as lean and mean and digestible as possible, so that Universal Pictures can acquire and buy the studio soon.
I believe the most important thing now is to give James Gunn and Peter Safran safety, or protection, from leadership changes and shifting corporate priorities, after Universal Studios takes over DC and Warner Brothers in a few years.
POTENTIAL COLLABORATIONS with filmmakers in DC projects

More Dwayne Johnson?
Even after Black Adam had a solid start at the box office just last week, opening to $140 Million worldwide, it’s doubtful that The Rock would be immediately willing to work with Gunn.
Both are incredibly self-promotional, and personal with their respective brands, have had no history working together, and it’s very likely The Rock wasn’t privy about the James Gunn deal at all! He might not have wanted Gunn in charge.
I say give this relationship time to breathe.
Zack Snyder / “The SnyderVerse”
Yes, Zack Snyder still has a small but vocal fanbase, who loves his work and constantly yells online for Zack to continue making DC projects, within his (amusingly titled) world: “The SnyderVerse”.
But based on Snyder’s personal history, and the films themselves (Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, Justice League), and the negative reactions they each received from both Warner Brothers and a lot of audiences/DC fans, I still think Snyder’s return as a DC filmmaker is too soon.


So while Snyders return as a DC filmmaker is too hard to tell, I believe James Gunn will build upon the world that Snyder created.
Margot Robbie will stick around as Harley Quinn, and Henry Cavill is fantastic as Superman (even if I’d argue that his portrayal as Clark Kent could use some work), and he has fans excited after his return in Black Adam.
James Gunn would be wise to keep them both.
Christopher Nolan
Recall back in 2020: after Nolan’s own film Tenet underwhelmed, and the studio Warner Brothers announced they would premiere all their upcoming films on HBOMax (without telling any filmmakers), Nolan decided to quit and leave Warner Brothers.
After 18 years of working under the studio, producing hits from Inception to The Dark Knight Trilogy, Nolan fled to Universal Pictures.


Now is it possible in a few years, under new management from Universal Pictures, that Nolan might be more inclined to return to make more superhero blockbusters under DC, like The Dark Knight? It’s very well possible.
But would Christopher Nolan even want to?
Marvel crossover?
Now this it would be quite the feather in James Gunns’ cap, if he could pull this off. James Gunn has mentioned for years that merging these two superhero universes would be an amazing sight to see, even if a merger of this size would take more than 10-20 years to pull off. But man, imagine!If Marvel’s quality somehow takes a nose-dive over the next 5 years, and DC’s rises back up, then an in-universe merger could be in the cards. As always, we’ll see…

-
Studios Winners and Losers: Before and After COVID
With no new blockbuster releases planned for the next few weeks, I thought it would be fun to take a moment to breakdown how the box office is so far for 2022, and to compare the 4 major studios (Paramount, Universal, Warner Bros and Disney).
So let’s compare their performances from 2019 (the last “normal” year), including money, reception, and expectations, to now.


PARAMOUNT STUDIOS
(a redemption story )
WAS in 2019: C-/C
NOW in 2022: A
Even before 2019, it has been a rough decade for Paramount. They sold off their biggest franchises (Marvel & Dreamworks Animation), and their own big franchises bombed (Transformers, Star Trek, G.I. Joe, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, etc.) , as the characters and top-of-the-line spectacle were seen as weak, compared to the more popular Star Wars or Marvel or Fast and Furious films.


But NOW in 2022, Paramount is officially king of the world again! In 2019, Paramount only earned $1.35 billion. Top Gun Maverick alone has earned $1.38 billion.
The studio isn’t 100% depending on pre-existing franchises, as The Lost City was a solid original hit ($190.8 million global).


But all of their sequels are doing better than their previous movies, as well as just better than expected. (Scream 5 with $140 million Global, Jackass Forever $80.3 million, Sonic the Hedgehog 2 $401.8 million)
Each of these were received well by critics and audiences, and had long legs.
The best example though is Top Gun Maverick. Not only did it earn more ticket sales than the first Top Gun (even adjusted for inflation), but it just passed Titanic as Paramount’s highest grossing film ever!
Paramount has clearly found great success from Tom Cruise’s movie-star charisma, working with him and his business partner/ writer/filmmaker Christopher McQuarrie for quite a long time.
Paramount is also looking for new relationships and signing new deals with movie stars like John Krasinski, and Ryan Reynolds.

Maverick is right now the biggest “part-two” sequel ever, and should end with $1.45+ billion. Your move, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever and Avatar: The Way of Water! Both those sequels will be released by Disney this holiday season.
With this hot streak, hopefully Paramount can keep this up with their continuing franchises, and strong relationships with actors and creative filmmakers.

UNIVERSAL PICTURES
(still rocking)
WAS in 2019: A-
NOW in 2022: A-
Before the pandemic in 2019, Universal had a couple of big blockbuster hits (Fast and Furious: Hobbs and Shaw, How to Train Your Dragon 3, Jordan Peele’s Us), well-received comedies (Good Boys, Yesterday) and some thrillers that underperformed (Glass, Ma, Black Christmas).
Now in 2022, Universal has more popular franchises with movies coming out, and is continuing their luck with original films from Blumhouse and Jordan Peele.

In 2019 through the entire year, Universal earned $3.671 billion. Through the first half of 2022, Universal has already crossed $3 Billion.

Universal had two blockbuster sequels that met expectations (Jurassic World 3: Dominion is nearing a billion [$975+ million Worldwide] despite the worst reviews/reception of the franchise.
Meanwhile Minions: Rise of Gru is expecting to end with over $800+ million worldwide. Even after over a decade or two, both franchises have characters and icons that still remain popular enough with today’s adults and kids (specifically, dinosaurs and minions).
Universal is also continuing their luck with distributing Blumhouse’s low-budget horror films. The Black Phone is at $155+ million worldwide, now the top horror film of 2022 internationally and globally, and is one of the biggest original Blumhouse films ever.
Another thriller, Jordan Peele’s Nope, should finish with $160-180 globally, which, while too expensive to be profitable in theaters (the budget was $69 million), should eventually break even on VOD and streaming.


Another highlight at Universal is DreamWorks Animation’s The Bad Guys, with $246.8M worldwide.
The cartoon was very well-reviewed and well-received, staying in the Top 10 U.S. Box Office for 10+ weeks.
Overall, Universal is still rocking up big numbers and box office successes, with strong potential relationships with filmmakers and talent.

WARNER BROS./ DISCOVERY
(frenetically figuring it out)
WAS in 2019: C+
NOW in 2022: C+

2019 was a mixed year for Warner Bros. They released several small old-school dramas, many of which underperformed or bombed (Richard Jewell, Blinded by the Light, Motherless Brooklyn, The Goldfinch), as well as sequels with tepid interest (Godzilla 2, Lego Movie 2, Doctor Sleep).
The only real solid success they had in 2019 was with DC films (Joker, Shazam).

Fast forward to 2022: the theatrical movies are performing better (Batman, Elvis, Fantastic Beasts 3), however behind the scenes, Warner Bros./Discovery appears a mess. Films are being cancelled left and right, staff and titles are being axed at on HBOMax, while the future success of their DC films is still uncertain (The Flash, Batgirl).


FIRST the good stuff. The Batman ($770 million global) was very successful and well-received (strong legs and SVOD sales) and should lead to a strong future relationship with Matt Reeves as filmmaker and director.
Elvis ($260+ million) has also been successful with long legs continuing throughout the summer.
NOW onto the bad/controversial. Fantastic Beasts 3 ($401 million global) was critically panned, the lowest Harry Potter movie ever and has effectively ended Wizarding World films at least for the near future.


And although the studio has outlined a 10-year plan to build the DCEU (DC Extended Universe) into the next Marvel, two of their next films have imploded. Batgirl, completed for $90m, was abruptly canceled with no plans for release, not even to streaming.
And The Flash‘s release, a film which is nearly completed for ~$300m, is still uncertain as its troubled star, Ezra Miller, faces criminal charges.
The killing of Batgirl by David Zazlav, the head of Warner Bros./Discovery (whose picture is on the RIGHT), is a signal this studio is cleaning up and refocusing. Zazlav’s focus on “it’s not about how much, it’s about how good” has led to cancelling many completed film projects, film productions, HBOMax and Discovery shows. And more content is likely on the chopping block.


Going forward, the company says it’s committed to using theaters as a driver of profit – not just dumping films immediately to streaming.
Emphasizing “theaters first”, plus the probable merging of HBOMax and Discovery into one streaming service, indicates it will take a while for the dust to clear on whether this “refocused” direction will yield future success.

DISNEY
(failing to expand…)
WAS in 2019: A
NOW in 2022: C+

In 2019 Disney had the most successful year for any studio ever. Their animated sequels rocked it (Frozen 2, Toy Story 4), their live action remakes rocked it (Aladdin, Lion King), Star Wars was mixed negative (Rise of Skywalker), but their Marvel movies were at the top of their game (Avengers: Endgame).
Now, it’s just Marvel that’s performing well in theaters. Disney is perhaps a victim of their own expectations, with Thor 4 and Doctor Strange 2 still earning healthy numbers ($750+ million and $955 million respectively), but feeling like missed potential given both their budgets and expectations from Disney investors.

Perhaps Disney’s focus on streaming and success on Disney+ has hurt their theatrical films, with less of an urge to see their upcoming films right away.
It doesn’t help that Marvel movies are pretty much now banned in China or Russia, which is increasingly becoming a problem (that’s $150-200 million in box office for each movie left on the table).

After 2019, the Chinese government has gained an anti-Disney bias, arbitrarily banning future Marvel films from playing in the country, in order to emphasize their own blockbusters in cinemas instead.
Hopefully this years Black Panther 2 will be big enough to do well without China.


But easily the worst blockbuster performance of the year though goes to the misfire Lightyear, the lowest grossing Pixar film ever with $230+ million global, on a $150-$200 million budget.
I still blame Disney+ for diluting the Pixar brand (Pixar‘s last 3 films went straight to streaming for free), but the damage has already been done against the studio’s reputation.
With the seemingly inexhaustible hunger for content to gain and retain streaming subscribers, AND stay on top at the box office, Disney may be running the risk of exhausting their brands (Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar) by pumping out endless theatrical and TV content.
CONCLUSION:
While none of these studios are in danger of folding any time soon, Warner Brothers/Discovery and Disney stocks are at lows.
It seems safe to say that there is a path for money to be made at the box office, at least for tentpole movie experiences. And although studios continue to be dependent on franchises for ideas, there is still room for original content to do well if the right cast and story is there.
But the era of “unlimited production of content” for streaming services seems to be ending, as studios and investors are finally realizing this feeding frenzy of content is not sustainable. That doesn’t mean that great non-tentpole content won’t be made; it just may have to find a new home, now that streaming is now longer the priority for the studios.
-
Weekend Box Office (7/31/22) ‘DC League Of Super-Pets’ Flies To $23M Opening, ‘Nope’ falls down to earth with -58% drop

DC’s League of Super Pets, the Dwayne Johnson/Kevin Hart animated action comedy, opened this weekend. The film essentially pitched itself as “The Secret Life of Pets, but co-starring the Justice League,” and earned surprisingly okay reviews (72% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes) and “fine” reactions from audiences (an A- from CinemaScore).

The $23 million opening was lower than expected, probably because the film plays like a tired version of The Lego Batman, and The Secret Life of Pets.
Maybe the filmmakers thought having big comedy stars, like The Rock and Kevin Hart, combined with superheroes would add energy, but it’s not enough to create a really exciting few hours.
It’s kind of funny that Dwayne Johnson was originally supposed to open this weekend with another Warner Bros./DC movie, Black Adam. (Talk about being all places at once).
But that project has been delayed until October, due to the backlog of special effects at post-production VFX warehouses. Probably a good thing, as the positive buzz that began at Comic-Con last week will hopefully snowball over the next few months, so that more fans will be excited for Black Adam by its release in the fall.


As for Super Pets, here’s a good comparison. The Bad Guys was another animated movie released in April 2022. Both movies had little competition when it came to family films, and both cost $80-90 million to make. Super Pets’ $23 million opening is equal to what The Bad Guys ran out the gate with.
The Bad Guys had slightly better word of mouth (an A CinemaScore), but still flew high to eventually earn $96.6 million in the U.S. and $250+ million worldwide. Based on that, one would hope Super Pets can pull in similar numbers, which would be pretty profitable – despite being a more tired and predictable film.


In other news Nope fell hard, dropping a steep 58.2% in its second weekend.
While Jordan Peele’s last film, Us, dropped 53% in it’s second weekend (a little better but in a similar ballpark), Us had a bigger opening ($71 million vs. $44 for Nope) and cost less (Us cost $20 million vs. Nope cost $69 million).
This leads to the question – Why is Nope struggling to find an audience?

One theory I have is: the Jordan Peele brand is highly intertwined with horror. From Candyman, Get Out, to Us. Although Nope has a few scary moments, it’s a slower film, with a sci-fi bent, and complex themes that might leave an audience scratching their heads to get the point.
Most people like to know what they’re getting into, before trekking to the theater and paying their $15.
Maybe in Peele’s quest to be original and thought provoking, he’s made a film that leaves the audience not really sure they got the point.
Peele has had a string of successes that have raised his profile as a director. Yet if Nope continues to disappoint in the upcoming weeks, it will be interesting to see if he gets as open a check book for his next film.


Thor 4 recovered somewhat in its fourth weekend, only falling 41.5% earning $13.17 million. The Taika Waititi-directed sequel is still expected to finish above what Thor Ragnarok ended with: $340-350 million domestically, and around $750 million worldwide (without China/Russia).
That’s a win, even if it’s less than Disney likely would have hoped for.
Minions: The Rise of Gru ran away with another $10.98 million weekend (39% drop) for $321 million so far. It aims to finish near the ending totals of Secret Life of Pets and Despicable Me 2 ($365-$370 million), as one of the biggest hits ever for Illumination Animation.


Top Gun: Maverick earned another $8.2 million (-20%) in its 10th weekend (!!), and is soon flying past $650 million domestic.

That puts it within a week of passing Jurassic World ($652 million in 2015) and Titanic ($659 million) to later become the 7th biggest film of all time in the U.S. box office. Wow!
The word of mouth is still on fire, plus with plenty of sky still to cover throughout August and September to earn more money. Can Tom Cruise be stopped?

Sony’s Where the Crawdads Sing continued to leg out, helped by being the summer’s only “big” movie for adult women. The Daisy Edgar-Jones $24 million melodrama earned $7.56 million (-27%) in its 3rd weekend, and should pass $70 million domestic by the end.
That’s a terrific result for the kind of drama that has spent the last two years getting banished to streaming, and should encourage Sony to release more of their films to theaters first.
Warner Bros. Discovery’s Elvis is also benefiting from adult audiences trekking out to the theater, as the Baz-Luhrmann-directed epic earned another $6 million weekend (-12%, a phenomenal hold).
At this rate, the $85 million Austin Butler/Tom Hanks musical biopic could reach $150 million domestically even before it becomes a major awards season player.


As for next weekend, Sony’s Bullet Train will open as the last “big” movie of the summer. The action thriller has a stacked cast of Brad Pitt, Sandra Bullock, Bryan Tyree Henry, Zazie Beetz, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson.
It’s also from director David Leitch, the filmmaker behind John Wick, Atomic Blonde, and Deadpool 2.
The hope would be that this $80-100 million budgeted action film would open with around $30 million, to then leg out for the rest of summer. But even if Bullet Train falls short of that, the film has clear sailing for the rest of August and September to find moviegoers.
And that’s it for the weekend box office. What films are you still interested in seeing or hearing about?
-
Weekend Box Office (7/24/22) Nope flies to $44 million debut, nice for an original thriller

Keke Palmer NOPE trailer Universal Pictures/Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=In8fuzj3gck Universal and Monkeypaw’s Nope flew off to a promising start, as the well-reviewed (83% on Rotten Tomatoes) and *mostly* well-received by audiences (B from CinemaScore – okay for a Horror movie) Jordan Peele adventure earned $44 million over its opening weekend.
It’s far less than Jordan Peele’s last film, Us (that opened to $71 million), but Us had a lot more publicity, star-power, less cryptic marketing, compounded with the anticipation and expectation of the movie as a metaphorical sequel to Get Out. But for an original thriller in this day and age, Nope’s opening is encouraging.

Nope is less a horror movie and more of a slow burn, sci-fi thriller, with interesting questions about the unknown and predators in nature (like a Spielberg adventure, ala Jaws or Close Encounters).

It has a fun, original script (Daniel Kaluuya and Keke Palmer play Hollywood horse wranglers, who try to film footage of a predatory UFO), and has some satisfying ending twists and spectacularly filmed sequences of suspense.
Yet it’s not a traditional horror movie, as it requires the audience to be patient for the “acts of terror”. It will be interesting to see how audiences respond in the weeks to come.

Nope officially cost $69 million to make, and has open real estate to make serious theatrical money during August and September, as there are few competitors for moviegoers looking for a thriller/scary film this summer.

As a filmmaker, Jordan Peele is easily comparable to M Night Shyamalan, or maybe Christopher Nolan. It’s not like many high-concept filmmakers have risen over the last 20 years, who consistently make original chilling thrillers that also become box office smashes.
While Nope clearly isn’t as popular as Jordan Peele’s previous 2 horror films, it does point to a positive relationship between Universal Studios and Peele in the years to come.

The $250 million budgeted Thor: Love and Thunder earned another $22.55 million (-51.6%) in its third weekend, and has $599 million worldwide so far.
We’re still looking at a fourth Thor movie that should end up just over/under the total of Thor: Ragnarök, both in the U.S. ($315 million) and worldwide ($712 million without Russia and China). That’s damn good for any fourth entry of any franchise. Word-of-mouth and audience reactions have been more mixed than previous Marvel movies, but the film is performing well by any rational standard.
Plus after yesterday’s Marvels’ Comic Con presentation, which announced almost 5 new exciting projects (including Fantastic Four and two new Avengers), fans now have less reason to be pessimistic about the franchises’ future.

Minions: The Rise of Gru earned another $18 million (-33%) in its 4th weekend for $298 million in the U.S. It’s earned better reviews and legs than the first Minions (which earned $288 million at this point), pointing to plenty of more life in this franchise. The $80 million budgeted prequel/sequel should end above $900 million worldwide. Despicable Me 4 is coming in summer 2024.

Where the Crawdads Sing earned a $10.5 million (-39%) in its 2nd weekend. With good word of mouth, this $24 million thriller should end with $65-70 million domestically. That’s a terrific result for the kind of movie that has spent the last two years getting banished to streaming, and should encourage Sony to release more of their films to theaters first.

Tom Cruise proves again that he’s unkillable, with Top Gun: Maverick dropping -16% (a phenomenal hold), earning earn another $10.27 million in its 9th weekend, for $636 million so far in the U.S. The film just passed $1.283 billion worldwide.
The word of mouth is still on fire, plus with plenty of sky still to cover throughout August and September to earn more money. Can Tom Cruise be stopped?

Warner Bros.’ Elvis earned another $6.58 million (-17%) over its 5th weekend (also a phenomenal hold), as the Baz Luhrmann-directed musical biopic has $119 million in the U.S. so far. Still expecting to finish with over $140 million, and much more worldwide.

As for next weekend, DC’s League of Super Pets opens. Animated movies have done well at the box office as of recently (The Bad Guys, Sing 2, Minions 2 etc.), and from what I’ve been told the movie is cute. It’s sold as The Secret Life of Pets but with superheroes, starring Kevin Hart and The Rock.
I’m not sure what the budget is for this, but a $35-40 million opening would be pretty great. I would laugh hard if this film opened bigger than the $200 million budgeted Lightyear.
And that’s it for the weekend box office. What films are you still interested in seeing or hearing about?
-
Weekend Box Office (7/17/22) Thor has pretty terrible second weekend drop (for Marvel), are Disney+ and fan fatigue to blame? Meanwhile Crawdads sings to an excellent debut
Note: I admittedly had too many headlines to choose from this weekend (Thor crashes down to earth, Thor shows Marvel isn’t worthy anymore, Thor shows not all gods are immortal), so don’t begrudge me for not being edgy with my opening headline.

Thor: Love and Thunder is again the top movie at the U.S. box office, earning another $46 million, dropping a “really bad” -68% from last weeks opening. While that’s the worst second weekend drop ever for a Marvel-Cinematic-Universe movie, it’s still earned $233 million for its first 10 days in theaters. That’s solid by most rational standards, but not good for Marvel.

How bad is this? Well, Marvel movies that open in mid-July tend to crash in their second weekends. Ant-Man and the Wasp, Spider-Man: Homecoming and Black Widow all took drops between 61% to 67% in their second weekends.
But Ant-Man 2 and Homecoming both recovered, and earned around 1.6x their first respective 10-day totals. Both were seen as hits. Black Widow (which had Disney+ cut into its box office) did not recover as well, only making 1.4x its first 10 days. That’s a difference of nearly $50 million.

With bad reviews and audience reactions (only a B+ CinemaScore and 3.5 stars on PostTrak), plus anticipation for Thor 4 streaming for free on Disney+, the film may have legs closer to Black Widow, or the much disliked Eternals last November.
That could mean an ending total of $315-$330 in the U.S. box office, on par with Thor 3 in 2017, despite this film opening bigger.

I’m concerned how much of a factor Disney+ will be on this film’s longevity. Maybe only the hardcore Marvel fans are showing up, while the casual fans are waiting until the movie is streaming free on Disney+.
Or, is fan fatigue happening, by this being the 29th movie in this saga? With over 4 movies and 5 Disney+ shows a year, it’s tough to know which projects moving forward are crucial to watch to understand the ongoing Marvel narrative. In the end, these are self-inflicted problems caused by Disney.

It helps there’s basically nothing left playing in theaters as far as “superheroic fun for families”, beyond the animated DC League of Super-Pets on July 29 and The Rock’s Black Adam on October 21.
Because of that, Thor 4 could have longer legs throughout August and September.
I also wrote HERE about how the film’s mixed word of mouth is similar to 1997’s Batman 4: Batman and Robin. We’ve been down this road before.
I could be over-thinking how audiences are responding. Thor 4 has already passed $500 million worldwide, and should likely top the last Thor film’s worldwide 2017 total (without China and Russia) of $715 million.
This could simply be another well-received “It’s entertaining, whatever” Marvel sequel, that will only perform a little better financially than Thor 3. They can’t all be Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Compare this to Top Gun Maverick, which has had no date planned for streaming / Video-On-Demand, and has been doing great with audiences all summer long.
Top Gun Maverick earned another $12 million (-23%) in its’ 8th-weekend, for $617.9 million in the U.S. and $1.236 billion so far, the biggest movie of the year. Easily one of the most impressive box office runs in my lifetime.

As for the rest of the box office, Minions 2: Rise of Gru earned another $26 million (-44%) in its third weekend, for $263 million so far. That’s a solid hold and a strong overall gross. Presuming it legs somewhere between Minions 1 and the last Despicable Me, this will likely end between $336 million and $380 million. Ironically, that would theoretically be more than Thor 4.

In smaller news, Sony’s $24 million budgeted Where the Crawdads Sing (starring Daisy Edgar-Jones, featuring a new Taylor Swift single, and based upon a very popular Delia Owens novel [12 million copies sold] ) debuted with an excellent $17 million over the weekend. Audiences reactions are good (A- CinemaScore, and 4 1/2 stars, 87% positive, 70% recommend on PostTrak).
The film, about a young woman raising herself in the marshlands after being left alone with her abusive father, is a character-focused story aimed at female adults. Considering this is one of the only “big” movies this summer aimed at adult women (that’s embarrassing), we can expect solid legs for this old-school potboiler/melodrama.

Not to be outdone, Warner Bros.’ buzzy and well-reviewed Elvis just passed $100 million in the U.S., earning another $7.6 million (-32%) in its 4th weekend. Interestingly, 71% of the audience has been women.
The musical biopic starring Austin Butler / Tom Hanks, directed by Baz Luhrmann, will soon become Warner Bros.’ biggest U.S. box office earner since Joker ($335 million in 2019) and behind The Batman ($370 million). Fantastic. This is a much needed win for the studio, and for bringing older audiences back to theaters.

Universal’s The Black Phone also passed $100 million worldwide this week, which propelled the Blumhouse studio’s lifetime total past $5 billion. This acclaimed and buzzy horror flick earned another $5.3 million (-31%) over its 4th weekend, a fantastic drop, despite now debuting on streaming. That gives the $19 million, R-rated flick a $72 million domestic cume, and much more money to come. That is assuming Universal’s own horror film Nope doesn’t take away its audience next weekend.
And that’s it for the weekend box office. What films are you still interested in seeing or hearing about?

I’m personally most hyped for Nope next weekend. To me, the concept of “an epic original alien invasion thriller”, directed by Jordan Peele, sounds like an entertaining time at the movies and a great summer popcorn blockbuster. It also helps it has one of the better trailers I’ve seen so far this year.
But let’s see if the reviews are good, or if audiences even choose to show up. It cost $68 million to make, so I’m hoping for at least a $40-50 million debut. As always, we’ll see.
-
ANALYSIS – with similar tonal comedy issues, is Marvel’s Thor 4 equivalent to 1997’s Batman and Robin? Hear me out…

I do enjoy hearing the notion of Thor 4 being compared to Batman 4: Batman & Robin. It’s not an exact comparison, but hear me out…
With each franchise, the 2nd film is disappointingly received, and a new director was brought in to “fix” the franchise (Taika Waititi and Joel Schumacher respectively) for the 3rd film.

They were then acclaimed for “saving” the franchise, by making a lighter, more comical 3rd film (Thor: Ragnarok and Batman Forever). Both were successful enough for the studio to allow the filmmaker to do WHATEVER they wanted with the next film, albeit with a time constraint. “Get the fourth film out fast”…

And then with the 4th film, it wasn’t just the studio to blame; the writer/director was seen as going “TOO FAR” in the comedy and jovial tone, even for general moviegoers. The comedy just didn’t mix as well with the material, undercutting the story, disappointing fans, and weak legs at the box office.
Hell both Thor 4 and Batman 4 have a bald monochromatic tragic villain, weird jealousies from the sidekicks, a terminal-illness subplot, gay subtext, a campy secondary villain [Zeus / Poison Ivy] who makes uncomfortable sex jokes… the comparisons goes on.
To me it’s an interesting comparison as far as superhero downgrades from the 3rd-to-4th movie, but also shows there’s light at the end of the tunnel. We’ve gone down this path before. There’s room to improve with the next movie, hopefully by adding a new director.




















